Refereeing a research paper

Journals do not generally have firm deadlines, but preventing consideration of a paper by taking a long time to review it is unethical. We will let you know how you can access it once it has been published. How does it change with the ranking of the journal?


Refereeing a research paper of guidance on how to review manuscripts may be a concern among your staff members, making them reluctant to conduct peer reviews. You should explicitly point out any such problems. When you submit your report we also ask that you declare any competing interests here also, so that they can be displayed on the referee report when published.

As soon as a referee report is received, it is published alongside the article and the current approval rating is displayed. If applicable, is the statistical analysis and its interpretation appropriate? You should tell the editor of any conflicts of interest. It might not cover the entire field, and it might have a specific point of view.

Is the problem so specific or so applied that it has no general applicability and does not merit wide publication? Since most researchers enjoy acting as reviewers, laboratory managers may have to assume one more responsibility: Is sufficient discussion included of the importance of the findings and their relevance to future understanding of disease processes, diagnosis or treatment?

There should be neither too much nor too little.

When contacting us, please attach a copy of your CV and complete this formso that we can be sure you meet our Referee Criteria. Reviewing also helps your laboratory staff develop professional networks outside your company by acquainting them with researchers in fields related to their own work.

The result of your reading should be a referee report that recommends for or against accepting the paper and lists necessary and suggested changes. His research interests include the performance analysis of computer systems and devices, computer architecture, and operating systems.

The most detailed data came from Prozone equipment which provided the following: When starting research, writing a paper, finishing the paper, and deciding where to submit it, ask yourself: Did the author do what he or she claims?

A survey of referees’ physiological and technical performance

Alan Jay Smith is a professor in the Computer Science Division of the Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Sciences at the University of California at Berkeley, where he has been on the faculty since and was vice chair of the department from July to June Has the problem been solved before?

The request will also appear in your My pages if you already have an account with us. More on this later. Is the description of the software tool technically sound? Generally, if the central players are busy, the referee will be busy as well.

Does the paper cover the material promised by the title or abstract? What goes in the report and what goes solely to the editor? Authors are eligible to publish - authors must be active life scientists or clinicians and the research must have been carried out at a recognised institution.

Again, those results would also be classified. This is important both as part of the decision process and also psychologically for the author: If in-match player performance data are difficult to obtain, in-match referee data are doubly so.

Refereeing Research Papers

Does this paper have anything to do with computer science or engineering? There are critical differences between journals and conferences. Third, you should evaluate the validity and significance of the research goal.How to Referee a Scienti c Paper The Referee Report Journal Submission (but not only) mint-body.comis.

Summary of the main points of the paper (1{5 sentences are enough). mint-body.comtion. Answers at least the following questions: Was the goal of the work worthwhile?

Were the developments correct? Was the paper well-written? mint-body.comendation. How to Referee a Research Paper Divc GitTord (with help from Roy Lcvin, Jim Horning, and Bob Ritchie) Februaiy 19S2 AM To start.

let’s imagine that an author has sent his new paper to a journal to be considered for. Well, that's your biggest worry when you're refereeing a paper, isn't it? I can't give a complete answer here. Certainly you should be prepared to put a fair amount of effort into understanding a crucial point in the paper, including asking friends and colleagues about background knowledge, if appropriate.

The author's primary responsibility is to effectively communicate their result to their audience, and a good editor will send you a paper to referee only if they think you're a good representative of the paper's intended audience.

Refereeing a paper can require considerable time and effort; don't waste that effort on a detailed critique of a badly flawed paper that can never be made publishable. Finding one or more fatal and uncorrectable flaws excuses the referee from checking all subsequent details.

Your research staff can play a role in the peer process by participating as referees for manuscripts.

What are the advantages and disadvantages of doing.

Refereeing a research paper
Rated 4/5 based on 61 review