An analysis of theories in the creation and origin of our universe

We have absolutely no way of knowing, from the Bible, how much time might have lapsed between the original creation 1: Instead, they were dynamical quantities that were shaped by the matter and energy in the universe.

According to this law, matter can neither be created nor destroyed, but only converted into other forms of matter, or into energy. The General Theory of Relativity and the discovery of the expansion of the universe shattered the old picture of an ever existing and ever lasting universe.

Then it suddenly exploded. All they need is their faith. In either case, the six days are not viewed as a time frame for the work of creation, but simply a literary structure for telling the story of creation. Astronomers have dozens of methods for establishing such distances, all of which generally agree with one another.

The simple fact is that the universe appears to be much older than ten thousand years. According to this theory the species arose in the time frame that modern science claims is indicated in the fossil record, but not as a result of evolution. As we all know, the problem of what happens at the edge of the world was solved when people realized that the world was not a flat plate, but a curved surface.

An Expanding Universe So if all the galaxies are moving away from Earth, does that mean Earth is at the center of the universe? On the surface, white hole cosmology seems to provide an explanation of the age differential between the earth and more distant parts of the universe; however, the specifics, as proposed by Humphreys face enormous problems both with the text of Genesis 1: How can you get something from nothing?

The Universe filled with clouds of hydrogen and helium gas. Since comets give off particles as they travel through space, if the universe were billions of years old, the comets would already be completely spent.

The implications of an absolute beginning to the natural realm would be a stunning defeat for naturalism—a defeat that the naturalistic scientific community absolutely could not allow to happen. While many people do believe their religions, many other people do not have a religious view of how the universe was created.

Some of these theories provide for reconciliation between Genesis and science both in regard to the age of the universe and biological evolution. With this, Hawking proceeds to explain how the universe might have emerged out of nothing that is, nothing other than imaginary time.

A new window on the very early universe will be opened when we can detect gravitational waves by accurately measuring the distances between space craft. One in which the universe was created last year and one in which the universe existed much longer.

One stream is what the Bible actually says about creation primarily the Genesis text. One can not ask whether the universe really existed before a year ago or just appeared to. The beginning of the universe would be governed by the laws of science.

Their results, if confirmed by further work, would have far-reaching implications for the multiverse paradigm. Of course the perceptive reader will recognize that this discussion crossed over from science to philosophy and theology long ago.

Now, for the next question: The universe was not unchanging with time as everyone had thought previously. We have two universes, which differ very little from each other, but the further we go, the more profound differences are. One can not ask whether the model represents reality, only whether it works.

First we need a time machine. According to this view the six days of Genesis were not six days in which creation took place, but six movements or chapters in the creation story.

Third, the idea that the original creation was judged by God could fit with the biblical description of the fall of Lucifer, presumably recorded in Ezekiel If the creation account is to be regarded as mythical, then the entire message of the Bible would be questionable.The Nature of Theories on Origins.

On the other hand, the theory of creation and the theory of evolution are attempts to explain the origin of the universe and of its inhabitants. There were no human observers to the origin of the universe, the origin of life, or, as a matter of fact, to.

What the Bible Actually Says About The Origin of the Universe Sam A. Smith, M.A., M.A., M.A. Biblical Reader Communications [HOME] A Brief History of Biblical Cosmology. One of the very interesting areas of biblical studies is creation.

The Big Bang Theory provided an atheistic explanation for the origin of the universe, but its obvious simplicity was subject to multiple attacks. As a result, the original theory is no longer the dominant scientific explanation for the atheistic origin of the universe.

The Origin of the Universe. By David Fishman. Grades. 6–8 But the Big Bang is not the only proposed theory concerning our universe's origin.

Alternatives to the Big Bang Theory Explained (Infographic)

In the s a competing hypothesis arose, called the Steady State theory. A minority of astronomers are formulating other views of the creation of the universe.

One model comes from the mind of. 5 Most Interesting Alternative Theories About The Universe. Home / Physics & Natural scientists are creating quite organized and compelling theories regarding composition and origin of our universe.

These theories are based on long-term observations of visible parts of the universe as well as on guesses.

The Nature of Science and of Theories on Origins

Creation of worlds according to. The General Theory of Relativity and the discovery of the expansion of the universe shattered the old picture of an ever existing and ever lasting universe. Instead, general relativity predicted that the universe, and time itself, would begin in the big bang.

An analysis of theories in the creation and origin of our universe
Rated 3/5 based on 48 review